The lesson of Red Fort is not merely about security lapses.

QUICK READ

• A symbolic strike at the heart of India

The car bomb explosion near Delhi’s Red Fort, killing 13 people, was not just a terror attack but a calculated assault on India’s sovereignty, targeting a monument that embodies national authority and unity.

• Terrorism has evolved beyond stereotypes

The alleged involvement of educated professionals highlights a disturbing shift: modern terror networks increasingly recruit ideologically driven, middle-class individuals, challenging the notion that terrorism is rooted only in poverty or illiteracy.

• Security measures alone are not enough

While India has strengthened laws, funding, and surveillance since 2014—preventing many attacks—the Red Fort blast shows that policing can contain violence but cannot eliminate the deeper causes of radicalisation.

• Terror is a political and regional problem, not just a domestic one

Unresolved conflicts in Kashmir, regional instability in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and cross-border militant ecosystems demonstrate that terrorism must be addressed through diplomacy, dialogue, and regional cooperation alongside enforcement.

• Punjab’s recovery offers a roadmap for peace

India’s defeat of terrorism in 1980s Punjab proves that lasting security comes from political reintegration, social healing, and restored trust in the state—lessons that remain urgently relevant today.

For more read the full article ..... 

NOVEMBER 2025

On the evening of November 10, an explosion ripped through a moving car near Delhi’s Red Fort. Thirteen lives were lost. Several more were scarred, physically and psychologically.

In a city that arrogances itself on layers of security, history, and symbolism, the blast was not just an act of violence, it was a rupture in the national conscience.

The legal response was swift.

The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and the Explosives Act were invoked.

The National Investigation Agency took over the probe.

The Prime Minister and the Home Minister promised justice; the Opposition demanded accountability.

This is the familiar grammar of terror in India. But beneath the statements, arrests, and press briefings lies a deeper, more uncomfortable question: what does terrorism mean for India today, and how should the Republic of India respond?

The Symbolism of Red Fort

The Red Fort is not just a monument. It is where India’s Prime Ministers speak to the nation every Independence Day. It is a symbol of Independent Republic of India.

It is a reminder of sovereignty, continuity, and constitutional authority.

An attack near it is designed to do more than kill, it seeks to humiliate the state, shake public confidence, and dominate the national imagination.

“Terrorism today is not confined to the desperate or the deprived.

Investigators have identified the driver of the car bomb as Dr. Umar-un-Nabi, a medical professional from Pulwama in Kashmir, the same district parched into national memory after the 2019 suicide attack that killed 40 CRPF personnel, claimed by Jaish-e-Mohammad.

Media reports suggest the Red Fort blast may be linked to a larger network involving educated professionals, doctors, technologists, and financiers, allegedly coordinated by handlers across borders.

If these details are borne out, the implications are stark.

Terrorism today is not confined to the desperate or the deprived.

It increasingly recruits from the educated middle class, weaponising ideology rather than poverty, grievance rather than hunger.

This challenges long-held assumptions about who becomes radicalised, and why. Those entrusted with to secure the inclusive conscience of India, must now wakeup to this new reality.

A Nation That Has Bled Before

India is no stranger to terrorism. From Punjab in the 1980s, Kashmir in the 1990s, Mumbai in 2008, to repeated attacks in Delhi, Bangalore, Hyderabad, and smaller towns, violence against civilians has been a recurring wound.

Yet, in the last decade, major terror incidents had largely been restricted to conflict zones such as Jammu and Kashmir, or regions facing internal unrest like Manipur.

The relative calm in metropolitan India had fostered a sense, perhaps illusory, that the threat was contained.

The Red Fort blast shatters that illusion.

It also exposes a paradox of counterterrorism: successful prevention is invisible, while failure is spectacular.

India spends heavily on internal security, over ₹2.3 lakh crore (approx. $20 Billion) allocated to the Ministry of Home Affairs in recent years.

Laws have been tightened, agencies empowered, surveillance expanded.

By many metrics, this has worked. Numerous plots have been foiled; arrests across states and seizures of explosives and chemical agents point to constant vigilance.

And yet, one explosion near the heart of power is enough to undo public confidence.

Terrorism Is Not Just a Law-and-Order Problem

Terrorism cannot be understood, or defeated, as merely a policing or law-and-order issue. Security forces can neutralise attackers; laws can punish conspirators. But terrorism feeds on conditions that force alone cannot erase:

·        political alienation,

·        unresolved conflicts,

·        ideological manipulation,

·        regional instability and

·        social fragmentation.

Here lies the crux.

This is where India’s debate becomes polarised. The ruling establishment has long argued that past governments were “soft” on terrorism, enabling violence through hesitation and appeasement.

Of course, there is truth in the need for firm enforcement. But firmness without reflection risks mistaking symptoms for causes.

The resurgence of militancy in Kashmir after 2019 illustrates this dilemma.

Heavy militarisation has prevented large-scale attacks, but it has not extinguished the sense of grievance among sections of the population.

“But firmness without reflection risks mistaking symptoms for causes.

Without sustained political dialogue, credible local leadership, and economic opportunity, security operations risk becoming a cycle of suppression and resentment.

The Neighbourhood Matters

No country fights terrorism in isolation, least of all India.

The Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan in 2021 has reshaped the regional security landscape, emboldened extremist ideologies and offered sanctuary to militant networks.

Pakistan’s internal instability continues to spill across borders.

Bangladesh and Sri Lanka have both grappled with radicalisation driven by identity politics and economic stress.

This reality demands that India’s counterterrorism strategy extend beyond borders.

Diplomacy, intelligence-sharing, and regional engagement are not optional add-ons; they are core components of national security.

Terrorism thrives in ungoverned spaces and broken states. Regional peace is domestic security by other means.

Lessons from Punjab: Force Plus Faith

India does not need to look far for lessons.

Punjab in the 1980s stands as a powerful reminder that terrorism is ultimately defeated not just by the gun, but by political reintegration and social healing.

The state crushed the Khalistani insurgency through decisive policing under Julio Francis Ribeiro and later K.P.S. Gill, but what sustained peace was the restoration of democratic politics, economic normalcy, and dignity.

The Rajiv–Longowal Accord of 1985, despite its flaws, acknowledged a vital truth: lasting peace cannot be imposed; it must be negotiated.

Militants were rehabilitated, elections revived, and ordinary citizens brought back into the constitutional fold.

Punjab’s recovery did not come overnight, but it endured.

If the Red Fort attacker’s roots indeed trace back to Kashmir, the parallel is unavoidable.

Suppression may deliver tactical victories. Only reconciliation delivers strategic peace.

An Attack on India, not a religion

Perhaps the most dangerous aftermath of terrorism is not the blast itself, but the divisions it seeks to inflame.

The victims of the Red Fort explosion came from different regions, religions, and backgrounds. Terrorism does not discriminate, and nor should the response.

This was not an attack on a community. It was an attack on India.

To reduce it to identity is to hand terrorists their greatest victory.

The Indian state, its media, and its political class bear a heavy responsibility to resist that temptation, to preserve calm, uphold constitutional values, and refuse the politics of fear.

Time for a Rethink

The Red Fort blast comes at an uncomfortable moment.

Only months ago, India projected strength through cross-border operations and muscular rhetoric.

Now, violence has struck at the symbolic heart of the Republic.

This does not mean the security apparatus has failed entirely, but it does mean the current policy framework is insufficient.

India needs a national security rethink that integrates force with fairness, vigilance with dialogue, and strength with justice. 

“The lesson of Red Fort is not merely about security lapses.

Terrorism will not end through laws alone, nor through silence about grievances. It will end when the state restores faith, faith that disputes can be resolved peacefully, identities can coexist, and the Republic belongs equally to all.

Until then, whether in Delhi or Kashmir, Punjab or Manipur, innocent Indians will continue to pay the price.

The lesson of Red Fort is not merely about security lapses.

It is about the kind of nation India chooses to be in the face of terror, reactive and divided on lines of religion, or resilient and wise with collective resolve.